Talk:Guilds/SADC - Revision history

Eldar at 19:11, 13 February 2009

2009-02-13T19:11:36Z

2009-02-12T21:12:21Z

2009-02-12T21:10:09Z

2009-02-10T14:42:07Z

2009-02-10T07:43:19Z

Deepwell Operation

2009-02-09T21:22:36Z

2009-02-09T21:22:08Z

2009-01-30T12:55:46Z

Deepwell Operation

2009-01-30T12:52:25Z

Option 2:

2009-01-30T12:50:30Z

Option 2:

@@ Line 113: / Line 113: @@
 ----
 After giving some serious thought I believe we should try to keep this arrangement as simple as possible.  The more complicated it is, the more problems we're likely to have.
@@ Line 143: / Line 145: @@
 - Aplus

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:12, 12 February 2009
Line 133:		Line 133:

	--Eldar		--Eldar
		+
		+	----

	this last proposition sounds good to me, although I'm not sure we need 50 share.		this last proposition sounds good to me, although I'm not sure we need 50 share.

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:10, 12 February 2009
Line 133:		Line 133:

	--Eldar		--Eldar
		+
		+	this last proposition sounds good to me, although I'm not sure we need 50 share.
		+
		+	I know personally I have mats for about 3 screw gears ready, which I'd be willing to "loan" if we decide the share will be smaller than that, and won't be in a hurry to get back.
		+
		+	What I'm wondering is, now what? how do we decide on a proposition and how do we move forward with it?
		+
		+	- Aplus

@@ Line 39: / Line 39: @@
 I am partial to option 3.  I think it's critical to have some sort of ownership rights in order to motivate people to come up with the necessary resources to build.  We need 12,000 metal which will require some serious effort.  I for one would like to get this up as soon as possible so we have petroleum available to fire the new furnaces.
 --Eldar
@@ Line 109: / Line 110: @@
 '''Comment'''
 So if we put up a kitchen close by and stock it, we might not need public assistance with pumping?

@@ Line 97: / Line 97: @@
 If we go for a completely public mine, there is no need for a person on duty since their only real function would be to enforce the cooperative take.
---[[User:Hepnezr]]
+--[[User:Hepnezr|Hepnezr]]
 ----
@@ Line 106: / Line 106: @@
 --Eldar

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:22, 9 February 2009
Line 104:		Line 104:

	You definitely need multiple people at zero stats to operate the well (probably 3 to 5). You could probably get by with 3 on grilled onions. You should be able to work the well solo with decent str/end food (maybe +3/+3 or so). If you can find a good strength herb nearby and eat it fresh from the ground you would be able to wind up the well to a max of 100+ before it's affects wore off since each wind will increase the tesion by an amount equal to your strength.		You definitely need multiple people at zero stats to operate the well (probably 3 to 5). You could probably get by with 3 on grilled onions. You should be able to work the well solo with decent str/end food (maybe +3/+3 or so). If you can find a good strength herb nearby and eat it fresh from the ground you would be able to wind up the well to a max of 100+ before it's affects wore off since each wind will increase the tesion by an amount equal to your strength.
		+
		+	--Eldar

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:22, 9 February 2009
Line 98:		Line 98:

	--[[User:Hepnezr]]		--[[User:Hepnezr]]
		+
		+	----
		+
		+	To operate the deepwell you need to wind the pump, then each minute as the pump unwinds the well will produce 6 petroleum which goes into the well's inventory. There is a pretty good description of this on the Tale 3 wiki.
		+
		+	You definitely need multiple people at zero stats to operate the well (probably 3 to 5). You could probably get by with 3 on grilled onions. You should be able to work the well solo with decent str/end food (maybe +3/+3 or so). If you can find a good strength herb nearby and eat it fresh from the ground you would be able to wind up the well to a max of 100+ before it's affects wore off since each wind will increase the tesion by an amount equal to your strength.

@@ Line 90: / Line 90: @@
 My understanding of well operation is also a bit sketchy but here is how I ''think'' it might work for us.
-Each member is given a time (or several times) during which she will be responsible for attending any mine operations.  How these operations are organized is up to the individual, but it is important that during each assigned time, a cooperative member is available.  It might be useful to have multiple people assigned for busy times.
+I think if we operate the well like a dig it might work best.  Any one can organize a 'pump' but a cooperative member is needed to get it going and take the petroleum out.
 The responsibility of the person "on duty" would be to assist any one who wishes to start pumping, like the organizer of a dig.  This person is also responsible for taking the petroleum out of the mine and stashing the cooperative take and handing it to the miners.

@@ Line 31: / Line 31: @@
 '''Comments:'''
-* There is no return on investment other than the ability to use the mine in the future
+* There is no return on investment other than the ability to use the mine in the future --[[User:Hepnezr|Hepnezr]]
 ===Option 3:===

@@ Line 28: / Line 28: @@
 '''Cons:'''
 *There is less incentive for people to donate the materials to build the well so it will probably take much longer to get going.
-*There will not be any direct correlation between how many resources a person provides to bulid the well and how much petroleum they get from it.
+*There will not be any direct correlation between how many resources a person provides to build the well and how much petroleum they get from it.
 '''Comments:'''
+* There is no return on investment other than the ability to use the mine in the future
 ===Option 3:===