Aperio - Genome Elongation Tests - Revision history

Aperio: /* BUNK */

2011-07-19T23:55:36Z

BUNK

Aperio: /* REFERENCE */

2011-07-19T23:32:36Z

REFERENCE

Aperio at 23:22, 19 July 2011

2011-07-19T23:22:10Z

Aperio at 11:58, 19 July 2011

2011-07-19T11:58:54Z

Aperio at 11:50, 19 July 2011

2011-07-19T11:50:21Z

Aperio at 11:47, 19 July 2011

2011-07-19T11:47:12Z

Aperio at 01:18, 18 July 2011

2011-07-18T01:18:09Z

Aperio at 01:07, 18 July 2011

2011-07-18T01:07:43Z

Aperio at 04:56, 17 July 2011

2011-07-17T04:56:49Z

Aperio at 04:56, 17 July 2011

2011-07-17T04:56:23Z

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 Back to [[User:Aperio]]
-= BUNK =
+== SUMMARY ==
 I'm eating crow on this... and more importantly, noticing some kind of change in the (G)Grapes phenotype or at least the Starting Grapes Characteristic (flax has some similar variations in starting values).  This rings a bell with T3 testing but I don't recall if any conclusions were made.
@@ Line 180: / Line 180: @@
   (1)             R YYR (of 2)
   (1)               YYR K

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
-= REFERENCE =
+== REFERENCE ==
-Initial Grapes (I) / Genome Length
+{|{table} border=10 cellpadding="1" cellspacing="3" style="background-color:#EE82EE"
- Amusement	11	33
+|'''Vine'''
- Appreciation	12	12
+|'''Initial Grapes (I)'''
- Balance        	08	31
+|'''Genome Length'''
- Contemplation	12	18
+|-
- Distraction	09	30
- Frivolity	12	34
+| Amusement
- Wisdom		08	24
+|11
 (I) has been introduced as the nomenclature for Initial Grape Count trait (NOTE: Legacy T3 that was lost or not adopted)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 Back to [[User:Aperio]]
 I'm eating crow on this... and more importantly, noticing some kind of change in the (G)Grapes phenotype or at least the Starting Grapes Characteristic (flax has some similar variations in starting values).  This rings a bell with T3 testing but I don't recall if any conclusions were made.
-Appreciation (QQQ) x Base Appreciation (QQQ)
+Disregard my subsequent commentary.  Most of it is based upon a faulty premise that has since been straightened out.  The value of this page, however, is in the research data and the techniques.
-KGYRYYR x YYRYYRK
 [[Aperio_-_Vine_Cross_Data]]
@@ Line 20: / Line 37: @@
   Aperio #10	10
-If there's no shortening or elongation, all of these vines should be uniform.  A weighted average should take 6 genes for each splint and effectively return a vine identical to the starting vine.
+If there's no shortening or elongation, all of these vines should be uniform regardless of the splice point.  It will effectively return a vine identical to the starting vine.
 These variations indicate that there is now genetic diversity and the resulting variations produces 4 different starting values (including the original).  IIRC, each of the other vines possess unique starting grape values so this detail MUST be contained in the genome length, the gene combination, or some other self-contained mechanism.
-Expected Variations should be a truth table of Short (10%) | Normal (80%) | Elongation (10%) based upon Ariella's notes.  That should yield 64% reproduction of the original Appreciation Vine (NN). 4% of the 4 outlier variations (SS, SE, ES, EE), and 32% (8% each) of the 4 normalish vines (SN, EN, NS, NE).
+Expected Variations should be a truth table of Short (25%) | Normal (50%) | Elongation (25%) based upon Ariella's notes.  That should yield 25% reproduction of the original Appreciation Vine (NN). 6.125% of each of the 4 outlier variations (SS, SE, ES, EE), and 12.25% of each of the 4 normalish vines (SN, EN, NS, NE).
 ---
@@ Line 58: / Line 64: @@
   (1) YYRK	111
-The first thing that leaps out (and seems contrary to the Shortening / Elongation Theory is that the G dropped.  It was my understanding from Ariella's Guide that something in the middle should drop and clearly the leftmost gene from the left split dropped.  It also looks like the leftmost of the right splint dropped else where could the RYRY / YRYR come from?
+The first thing that leaps out is that the G dropped
   K YRY

@@ Line 119: / Line 119: @@
            YYR YYY R (diamond trial confirms)
   #8 K GYR YYR RYY YRY YR K (14)
-        R YYR YYR (diamond trial on #8 doesn't fit)
+              RYY RYY R (diamond trial on #8 doesn't allow RYYY)
 Aperio #10 Initial Grapes = 10 (20 trials of Clear Solvent [4 genes])
-  KGYR	1
+  (1) KGYR	1
-  RYRY	1
+  (1) RYRY	1
-  RYYR	1111
+  (2) RYYR	1111
-  YRYR	11
+  (1) YRYR	11
-  YRYY	111 111 111 1
+  (3) YRYY	111 111 111 1
-  YYYR	1
+  (1) YYYR	1
-  YYRK	1
+  (1) YYRK	1

@@ Line 116: / Line 116: @@
 I'm anticipating:
-  #7 K GYR YYR YYY RYY RK
+  #7 K GYR YYR YYY RYY RK (13)
            YYR YYY R (diamond trial confirms)
-  #8 K GYR YYR YYR YYR K
+  #8 K GYR YYR RYY YRY YR K (14)
-         R YYR YYR OR
+         R YYR YYR (diamond trial on #8 doesn't fit)
 Aperio #10 Initial Grapes = 10 (20 trials of Clear Solvent [4 genes])

@@ Line 104: / Line 104: @@
   YYRY	111
   YYYR	1
 Looks like #8, with a non-shortened left splint and an elongated right splint.  I should retest both more rigorously with better solvent to differentiate them.

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:56, 17 July 2011
Line 112:		Line 112:

	Aperio #10 Initial Grapes = 10 (?? trials of Clear Solvent [4 genes])		Aperio #10 Initial Grapes = 10 (?? trials of Clear Solvent [4 genes])
		+
		+	KGYR 1
		+	RYRY 1
		+	RYYR 1111
		+	YRYR 11
		+	YRYY 111 111 111 1
		+	YYYR 1
		+	YYRK 1