Talk:Main Page - Revision history

Talibeh: /* Why no Table of Contents? */ ToC added

2010-10-05T16:36:30Z

Why no Table of Contents?: ToC added

2010-09-29T15:15:46Z

Why no Table of Contents?: new section

2010-08-17T06:27:14Z

Tale-to-tale or shard-to-shard info copying.

2010-08-16T20:34:22Z

2010-08-16T11:49:10Z

2010-08-16T11:48:25Z

2010-08-14T20:00:17Z

2010-08-14T20:00:00Z

2010-08-12T04:35:49Z

PRE tag style: new section

2010-08-11T11:08:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:36, 5 October 2010
Line 21:		Line 21:

	I noticed that the table of contents is specifically turned off for the wiki home page. Some important information (the Welcome to the wiki orientation text) is buried below some other items, which could be fixed by putting a table of contents back in. What is the reason for NOT having a TOC, and is that reason still valid? -[[User:Talibeh\|Talibeh]] 10:15, 29 September 2010 (EST)		I noticed that the table of contents is specifically turned off for the wiki home page. Some important information (the Welcome to the wiki orientation text) is buried below some other items, which could be fixed by putting a table of contents back in. What is the reason for NOT having a TOC, and is that reason still valid? -[[User:Talibeh\|Talibeh]] 10:15, 29 September 2010 (EST)
		+
		+	:I added the TOC back in, and streamlined the previous 'splash' headlines so they integrate better into the other information on the page. I don't think I deleted any information, just moved it and provided links. -[[User:Talibeh\|Talibeh]] 11:36, 5 October 2010 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:15, 29 September 2010
Line 17:		Line 17:
	Here's an example		Here's an example
	Thanks.		Thanks.
		+
		+	== Why no Table of Contents? ==
		+
		+	I noticed that the table of contents is specifically turned off for the wiki home page. Some important information (the Welcome to the wiki orientation text) is buried below some other items, which could be fixed by putting a table of contents back in. What is the reason for NOT having a TOC, and is that reason still valid? -[[User:Talibeh\|Talibeh]] 10:15, 29 September 2010 (EST)

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 * Excellent!  I've seen these markings and I think they're taking off. Let's make it so!  Any objections to putting a temporary "splash" on the front page to this effect?
-'''Newbie-friendly homepage?'''
+== Newbie-friendly homepage and links? ==
 Being a newbie in T4 and still a newbie now, I found it a bit hard to find some stuff on the wiki as I was slowly learning the game and making sense of things.
 What do you guys think of putting a panel on the home page similar to what I put on my user's page: [[User:Akilan]]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-'''Tale-to-tale or shard-to-shard info copying.'''
+== Tale-to-tale or shard-to-shard info copying. ==
 I have an idea.. could we come up with a markup or an icon... something like ?/! that signifies "this item suspect, information copied from old"  and the converse: "most of this page is copied from old as the template says, but this particular item is CONFIRMED this telling/shard".
 Some of the pages are getting confusing and at some time you hit a 'tipping point' where the majority of information is accurate, the T4 banner should come down, but several items are still suspect. --- Gwyr 8/9/2010
 * I would suggest using {{5}} (obtained by the markup <NOWIKI>{{5}}</NOWIKI>) to indicate the information following that symbol has not been verified.  This can then mean the T4 banner come down from the heading of the page, where it would be very difficult to remove before hand.  An example of this symbol in use is on the [[Skills]] page.
 * I would also suggest using {{5ok}} (obtained by the markup <NOWIKI>{{5ok}}</NOWIKI>) to indicate the information has been verified.
 '''Newbie-friendly homepage?'''

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 What do you guys think of putting a panel on the home page similar to what I put on my user's page: [[User:Akilan]]
 Should make it easy for a novice to get the guides they want to see and still useful for advanced users to jump to where they want to go.
-Thoughts? - Akilan
+Thoughts? - Akilan (Note: obviously, the layout was stolen from the ever-useful Dwarf Fortress wiki)
 == PRE tag style ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:35, 12 August 2010
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Some of the pages are getting confusing and at some time you hit a 'tipping point' where the majority of information is accurate, the T4 banner should come down, but several items are still suspect. --- Gwyr 8/9/2010		Some of the pages are getting confusing and at some time you hit a 'tipping point' where the majority of information is accurate, the T4 banner should come down, but several items are still suspect. --- Gwyr 8/9/2010
	* I would suggest using {{5}} (obtained by the markup <NOWIKI>{{5}}</NOWIKI>) to indicate the information following that symbol has not been verified. This can then mean the T4 banner come down from the heading of the page, where it would be very difficult to remove before hand. An example of this symbol in use is on the [[Skills]] page.		* I would suggest using {{5}} (obtained by the markup <NOWIKI>{{5}}</NOWIKI>) to indicate the information following that symbol has not been verified. This can then mean the T4 banner come down from the heading of the page, where it would be very difficult to remove before hand. An example of this symbol in use is on the [[Skills]] page.
		+
		+	== PRE tag style ==
		+
		+	Can someone take a look at this and see about upping the font size on it? It's rather tiny in this skin.
		+	Here's an example
		+	Thanks.

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:08, 11 August 2010
Line 2:		Line 2:
	I have an idea.. could we come up with a markup or an icon... something like ?/! that signifies "this item suspect, information copied from old" and the converse: "most of this page is copied from old as the template says, but this particular item is CONFIRMED this telling/shard".		I have an idea.. could we come up with a markup or an icon... something like ?/! that signifies "this item suspect, information copied from old" and the converse: "most of this page is copied from old as the template says, but this particular item is CONFIRMED this telling/shard".
	Some of the pages are getting confusing and at some time you hit a 'tipping point' where the majority of information is accurate, the T4 banner should come down, but several items are still suspect. --- Gwyr 8/9/2010		Some of the pages are getting confusing and at some time you hit a 'tipping point' where the majority of information is accurate, the T4 banner should come down, but several items are still suspect. --- Gwyr 8/9/2010
		+	* I would suggest using {{5}} (obtained by the markup <NOWIKI>{{5}}</NOWIKI>) to indicate the information following that symbol has not been verified. This can then mean the T4 banner come down from the heading of the page, where it would be very difficult to remove before hand. An example of this symbol in use is on the [[Skills]] page.