Talk:Steam Silt Collector - Revision history

Myn at 07:35, 1 April 2016

2016-04-01T07:35:43Z

Sage at 10:50, 17 February 2016

2016-02-17T10:50:39Z

Sage at 10:32, 17 February 2016

2016-02-17T10:32:30Z

Sage: Created page with "Saw early reports of tens of thousands from Balthazarr overnight and over 100,000 overnight from another early adopter of the Steam Silt Collector. Why the disparity? Balthazarr ..."

2016-02-17T10:20:23Z

Created page with "Saw early reports of tens of thousands from Balthazarr overnight and over 100,000 overnight from another early adopter of the Steam Silt Collector. Why the disparity? Balthazarr ..."

New page

Saw early reports of tens of thousands from Balthazarr overnight and over 100,000 overnight from another early adopter of the Steam Silt Collector. Why the disparity? Balthazarr said his broke -- so is it just a luck game to keep these things running all night? '''[[User:Sage|Sage]]'''

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:35, 1 April 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Saw early reports of tens of thousands from Balthazarr overnight and over 300,000 overnight from another early adopter of the Steam Silt Collector, tuned to 6. Balthazarr said his broke -- so is it just a luck game to keep these things running all night? '''[[User:Sage\|Sage]]'''		Saw early reports of tens of thousands from Balthazarr overnight and over 300,000 overnight from another early adopter of the Steam Silt Collector, tuned to 6. Balthazarr said his broke -- so is it just a luck game to keep these things running all night? '''[[User:Sage\|Sage]]'''
−	* Khaled: "It ~~looked like a little RC tank~~. I ~~wouldn~~'~~t have it~~ in ~~my camp~~, ~~honestly~~. ~~Also~~, it ~~had a top exhaust~~, and ~~the graphic for~~ it ~~was A LOT~~, ~~as in~~, ~~maybe we're being given~~ a ~~hint that it pollutes~~."	+
		+
		+	It '''is''' possible to build multiple collectors in the same spot, however, they appear to interfere with each other. In our spot, we have built 2 collectors. I'd start both at the same time, come back 5 minutes later, one had stopped - not broken, but stopped. Another time, I'd start only one of them, come back in 20 mins or so, it's broken and required repair. I'd repair it, start it up, and again(!) 20 minutes later, it's broken. ...and again and again. It's simply too expensive to carry on like this. There were no messages, pop-up or otherwise, indicating that there was or would be a problem with multiple collectors on the same spawn. --- [[User:Myn\|Myn]] 02:35, 1 April 2016 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:50, 17 February 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Saw early reports of tens of thousands from Balthazarr overnight and over 300,000 overnight from another early adopter of the Steam Silt Collector, tuned to 6. Balthazarr said his broke -- so is it just a luck game to keep these things running all night? '''[[User:Sage\|Sage]]'''		Saw early reports of tens of thousands from Balthazarr overnight and over 300,000 overnight from another early adopter of the Steam Silt Collector, tuned to 6. Balthazarr said his broke -- so is it just a luck game to keep these things running all night? '''[[User:Sage\|Sage]]'''
		+	* Khaled: "It looked like a little RC tank. I wouldn't have it in my camp, honestly. Also, it had a top exhaust, and the graphic for it was A LOT, as in, maybe we're being given a hint that it pollutes."

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:32, 17 February 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	Saw early reports of tens of thousands from Balthazarr overnight and over ~~100~~,000 overnight from another early adopter of the Steam Silt Collector. ~~Why the disparity?~~ Balthazarr said his broke -- so is it just a luck game to keep these things running all night? '''[[User:Sage\|Sage]]'''	+	Saw early reports of tens of thousands from Balthazarr overnight and over 300,000 overnight from another early adopter of the Steam Silt Collector, tuned to 6. Balthazarr said his broke -- so is it just a luck game to keep these things running all night? '''[[User:Sage\|Sage]]'''