The Wiki for Tale 4 is in read-only mode and is available for archival and reference purposes only. Please visit the current Tale 11 Wiki in the meantime.

If you have any issues with this Wiki, please post in #wiki-editing on Discord or contact Brad in-game.

Difference between revisions of "Talk:Wahim"

From A Tale in the Desert
Jump to navigationJump to search
(New page: "Yes there's a typo in Wahim's Manifesto. It just goes to show that he's human too. If you doubt this transcription is correct, you can read Wahim's Manifesto at any [[University of Leader...)
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
"Yes there's a typo in Wahim's Manifesto. It just goes to show that he's human too. If you doubt this transcription is correct, you can read Wahim's Manifesto at any [[University of Leadership]]." - originally on main page under manifesto of initate.
 
"Yes there's a typo in Wahim's Manifesto. It just goes to show that he's human too. If you doubt this transcription is correct, you can read Wahim's Manifesto at any [[University of Leadership]]." - originally on main page under manifesto of initate.
  
I checked at Ulead its been fixed I presume it was the word losse instead of losses, have run it through a spell checker and it didn't find any other error. Have updated it to read correctly, moved this to discussion page as out of date.--[[User:Trillian|Trillian]] 11:22, 5 March 2010 (EST)
+
I checked at Ulead its been fixed I presume it was the word losse instead of losses, have run it through a spell checker and it didn't find any other error. Have updated it to read correctly, moved this to discussion page as out of date.--[[User:Trillian|Trillian]] 11:22, 5 March 2010 (EST)

Latest revision as of 16:22, 5 March 2010

"Yes there's a typo in Wahim's Manifesto. It just goes to show that he's human too. If you doubt this transcription is correct, you can read Wahim's Manifesto at any University of Leadership." - originally on main page under manifesto of initate.

I checked at Ulead its been fixed I presume it was the word losse instead of losses, have run it through a spell checker and it didn't find any other error. Have updated it to read correctly, moved this to discussion page as out of date.--Trillian 11:22, 5 March 2010 (EST)