The Wiki for Tale 4 is in read-only mode and is available for archival and reference purposes only. Please visit the current Tale 11 Wiki in the meantime.

If you have any issues with this Wiki, please post in #wiki-editing on Discord or contact Brad in-game.

Difference between revisions of "Vine Genome Theories"

From A Tale in the Desert
Jump to navigationJump to search
(New page: Quality is RYYR; Proof: KGYGYYRYYRYYRK is Q2; KGYRYYXYYRYYRK is Q1 (X could be Y or G, mutagen isn't narrow enough) Suspected Skin is YRO; Reasoning: KYROGYROGYROGGGGGGGGGGGGGK is 3K; KRY...)
 
 
(10 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Quality is RYYR; Proof: KGYGYYRYYRYYRK is Q2; KGYRYYXYYRYYRK is Q1 (X could be Y or G, mutagen isn't narrow enough)
 
Quality is RYYR; Proof: KGYGYYRYYRYYRK is Q2; KGYRYYXYYRYYRK is Q1 (X could be Y or G, mutagen isn't narrow enough)
  
Suspected Skin is YRO; Reasoning: KYROGYROGYROGGGGGGGGGGGGGK is 3K; KRYYRGYROGGGGGRYYROK is 2K
+
Skin is YRO; Proof: KYROGYROGYROGGGGGGGGGGGGGK is 3K; KRYYRGYROGGGGGRYYROK is 2K; KGYRYYRYYROYRK is 1k
 +
 
 +
Sugar is connected with Y genes, Supposed all Y genome has >0 Sugar Phenotype, will check it's not S1 and a mistake was made in making it.
 +
 
 +
Checked with KGYRYYRYYRYYYK, has one sugar mutation. Cross-reference with known sugar vines, only gene set possible is YYY. If it involved YYR, Appreciation would be S, if it was RYYY, Frivolity wouldn't have sugar.
 +
 
 +
Grapes is OOOR; KOOOYOOOOOOOOK is 0G; KYYYGGGRYYRGGGYROGGGRROOYYGGOOORK is 1G; reference other standard gene sets eliminates all else.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
== Pascalito and Ariella's 2 cents (or is it 4 cents?): ==
 +
Lots of research with mutagens on vines with 6 or less genes revealed the following results:
 +
 
 +
Acid = OYYG
 +
 
 +
Color = RROOYY
 +
 
 +
Grapes = OOOR
 +
 
 +
sKin = YRO
 +
 
 +
Quality = RYYR
 +
 
 +
Sugar = YYY
 +
 
 +
Vigor = GGGRO

Latest revision as of 23:51, 6 May 2010

Quality is RYYR; Proof: KGYGYYRYYRYYRK is Q2; KGYRYYXYYRYYRK is Q1 (X could be Y or G, mutagen isn't narrow enough)

Skin is YRO; Proof: KYROGYROGYROGGGGGGGGGGGGGK is 3K; KRYYRGYROGGGGGRYYROK is 2K; KGYRYYRYYROYRK is 1k

Sugar is connected with Y genes, Supposed all Y genome has >0 Sugar Phenotype, will check it's not S1 and a mistake was made in making it.

Checked with KGYRYYRYYRYYYK, has one sugar mutation. Cross-reference with known sugar vines, only gene set possible is YYY. If it involved YYR, Appreciation would be S, if it was RYYY, Frivolity wouldn't have sugar.

Grapes is OOOR; KOOOYOOOOOOOOK is 0G; KYYYGGGRYYRGGGYROGGGRROOYYGGOOORK is 1G; reference other standard gene sets eliminates all else.


Pascalito and Ariella's 2 cents (or is it 4 cents?):

Lots of research with mutagens on vines with 6 or less genes revealed the following results:

Acid = OYYG

Color = RROOYY

Grapes = OOOR

sKin = YRO

Quality = RYYR

Sugar = YYY

Vigor = GGGRO