User:Ariella

Funerary Temple

Tiles Used:

      26 Alice Blue
      49 Black
       8 Dark Green
      47 Dark Slate Blue
       2 Dark Slate Gray
     343 Ghost White
       3 Honey Dew
     343 Lavender
     343 Light Blue
     343 Light Green
      49 Medium Turquoise
      49 Mint Cream
     343 Orchid
      49 Pale Green
       6 Pink
      49 Plum
      46 Powder Blue
      49 Sky Blue
       6 Snow
      49 Teal
     394 Thistle
     343 White
     345 White Smoke

Flax Solvent data

Ariella#5 NG/OE 3 0 1 2 1 (Cross #17-20 3 flax genes on left)

• expected length 32-34
• ORGR OYGR RRRG GYRK YGYG RYRR ROYG RRGG RRYO GYOR YOOY YGRR RGRG GYGY RGYG RGGR KORG YRRR YGYO
• genome: KORGRGYGYGY|G|YORYRRRGGROYGRRYOOYGYRK, length 33

Default 5 weeds - 2 weeds(2 OR) and -2 weeds(3 Flax) Default -1 water +3 water(3 Flax) GYGYGYGY = 3 flax

Ariella#8 OE/NG 2 1 1 2 0 (Cross #17-20 rotten genes on right)

• expected length 32-34
• RYYO OYYO RRGY GYOR 2YYRG 2GYGY ORRK RGYO ORYY ORRG RGYG KRYY YOGY 2GRGY OGYG
• genome: KRYYOGYGYO|R|R|GYGYGYGRGYORYYRGROYYORRK, length 34 (R added) (if old theory is correct, this would be 3 flax, so the shortened genome is probably the right one)
• or genome: KRYYOGYGYORR|GYGYGRGYORYYRGROYYORRK, length 32 (gene dropped)
• other combos would be too long or too short (presuming baby is average length with gene added or dropped)
• flax: 2(GYGY)
• rotten flax: 1(RRGY)
• seeds: 1(RO)
• weeds: 5(default) - 3(OR) - 1(2 flax - 1) = 1 BUT WE HAVE 2
  • me might conclude: weeds is not dimished by (# flax -1) but by (# of GYGYGY strings) resulting in 5 - 3 - 0 = 2
• water: -1(default) + 2(flax) - 0(ROGY) = 1 BUT WE HAVE 0
  • we might conclude: hard to tell yet, could be add of(# of GYGYGY strings) so that GYGYGY converts a weed to water resulting in -1 + 0 = -1 thus 0; also would explain why high flax producers still can have 0 water like seen in Tale 3; would put the ROGY which was uncertain still in big doubt

Tedra #297 4 3 6 1 0 Flax/Rotten/Seeds/Weed/Water

6GYRR YGYY ROGY 3GYGY 2YROK OROY RRRG YRRG OROR YORR GYOR ROYR RORO RGYG 2RRGY OROO YGYR ORRG KRRO

• genome: ...YROK (impossible to make a prediction with these data, probably need longer strings)

                  GYRR
    YGYY
                                         ROGY
                               GYGY
                                                            YROK
                                                         OROY
                    RRRG
                    YRRG
                                                       OROR
       YORR
                                                     GYOR
                                                          ROYR
                                                        RORO
                              RGYG
                     RRGY

• the OK at end indicates there has been a full left part taken once in ascendents, since NE and NG do not have OK at end, unless 2 genes of NG were dropped in history (a conclusion that helps us no further)
• we expect: 4 GYGY, 3 RRGY, 6 RO (4 RO's certain from tests), 4 OR (3 OR's certain from tests) and/or GYGYGY, max 1 GYGYGY (unless ROGY diminishes water)

Tedra #253 5 2 6 0 1 Flax/Rotten/Seeds/Weed/Water

2OROR 2YGYG ORRG RRRR GYOR 4GYGY RRGY 2RORO 2GYYG KRRO ROGY RRRO YGYY

• genome: KRRO... (impossible to make a prediction with these data, probably need longer strings)

      OROR
            YGYG
        ORRG
              RRRR
           GYOR
           GYGY
         RRGY
     RORO
           GYYG
   KRRO
                 ROGY
               RRRO
             YGYY

• we expect: 5 GYGY, 2 RRGY, 6 RO (4 RO's certain from tests), at least 5 OR (3 OR's certain from tests) and/or GYGYGY, minimum 2 GYGYGY (unless ROGY diminishes water)

Tedra #246 3 3 7 1 0

ORRG 3YORR 2ORRG RGYR RGYG OROY YRRG 4RORO RROG RRGY YGYR KRRO RRRO RROO

• genome: KRRO... (impossible to make a prediction with these data, probably need longer strings)

   KRRO
    RROG

• we expect: 3 GYGY, 3 RRGY, 7 RO (4 RO's certain from tests), 4 OR (3 OR's certain from tests) and/or GYGYGY, max 1 GYGYGY (unless ROGY diminishes water)

Zaniac #390 4 2 5 1 0

2YRGY 2YOGY 3YRRG 2RORO GYRG YROK 3GYGY 2GYRR OGYG YGYY RYYO ORRG RRGY

• genome: ...YROK (impossible to make a prediction with these data, probably need longer strings)

                                      YROK

• we expect: 4 GYGY, 2 RRGY, 5 RO (3 RO's certain from tests), 4 OR (2 OR's certain from tests) and/or GYGYGY, max 1 GYGYGY (unless ROGY diminishes water)