The Wiki for Tale 4 is in read-only mode and is available for archival and reference purposes only. Please visit the current Tale 11 Wiki in the meantime.

If you have any issues with this Wiki, please post in #wiki-editing on Discord or contact Brad in-game.

Difference between revisions of "Vine Genome Theories"

From A Tale in the Desert
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
Sugar is connected with Y genes, Supposed all Y genome has >0 Sugar Phenotype, will check it's not S1 and a mistake was made in making it.
 
Sugar is connected with Y genes, Supposed all Y genome has >0 Sugar Phenotype, will check it's not S1 and a mistake was made in making it.
 +
 +
Checked with KGYRYYRYYRYYYK, has one sugar mutation. Cross-reference with known sugar vines, only gene set possible is YYY. If it involved YYR, Appreciation would be S, if it was RYYY, Frivolity wouldn't have sugar.

Revision as of 18:00, 17 February 2010

Quality is RYYR; Proof: KGYGYYRYYRYYRK is Q2; KGYRYYXYYRYYRK is Q1 (X could be Y or G, mutagen isn't narrow enough)

Skin is YRO; Proof: KYROGYROGYROGGGGGGGGGGGGGK is 3K; KRYYRGYROGGGGGRYYROK is 2K; KGYRYYRYYROYRK is 1k

Sugar is connected with Y genes, Supposed all Y genome has >0 Sugar Phenotype, will check it's not S1 and a mistake was made in making it.

Checked with KGYRYYRYYRYYYK, has one sugar mutation. Cross-reference with known sugar vines, only gene set possible is YYY. If it involved YYR, Appreciation would be S, if it was RYYY, Frivolity wouldn't have sugar.