The Wiki for Tale 4 is in read-only mode and is available for archival and reference purposes only. Please visit the current Tale 11 Wiki in the meantime.

If you have any issues with this Wiki, please post in #wiki-editing on Discord or contact Brad in-game.

File talk:Delimiter Small.png

From A Tale in the Desert
Jump to navigationJump to search

Delimiter Size

The delimiter is bigger than required for two reasons: first, it's used on more than one page and making it to fit one page makes it to small for others; second, the width of the boxes it is used in is given in units relative to the user's font size. This means that the exact pixel width of those boxes varies from user to user and cannot be determined.

If there are problems such as the delimiter breaking the page in your browser, please tell me your OS/Browser combination and I'll try to fix it. :-)

The deliminater is breaking the page for chrome as it is 900px wide it is making every table 900px wide. The image need t be reduced or set as a proper background. The edit needed is in Template:BResCompleteTemplate:BResTechnology‎ Template:BTechnology changing the width in the div tag from width="100%" to width="26em" I hope this does not break any other pages"
Sorry the details I have entered are incorrect, I have been testing and the image being in the table is preventing it from properly hiding the overflow, I am looking in to the cause of this.
Ok the best solution is adding table-layout:fixed to the style of the table ie: {| style = 'table-layout:fixed; width: 23em; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border-spacing: 0; border-left: 1px solid black; border-right: 1px solid black' The down side to this is that the colspans that are in there need to be cleaned up. but this lets the div width be placed at 100% like it you intended.
media:Thefilebreak.png
Ah, sorry for that, seems that Chrome and Firefox treat overflow differently :-/ I think I fixed it now. I would love to set them as proper background, but I haven't figured out how; MediaWiki seems to filter all images from CSS properties :-(
Alya 14:39, 4 March 2010 (EST)