The Wiki for Tale 4 is in read-only mode and is available for archival and reference purposes only. Please visit the current Tale 11 Wiki in the meantime.
If you have any issues with this Wiki, please post in #wiki-editing on Discord or contact Brad in-game.
Difference between revisions of "User talk:Seba/Laws/The Good Judge"
m |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | = Current Sections = | |
| + | == § Appointment == | ||
| + | This vote is to be referred to as the initial vote. After the initial vote, whenever a vacancy arises a new vote will be called within one week. Candidates have one week to turn in their petitions, allowing a world wide vote to take place. <i>Is this needed it seems like bloat? ~[[User:Seba|Seba]]</i> | ||
| − | A | + | A Judge shall receive the title of "Judge". <i>Agreed ~[[User:Seba|Seba]]</i> |
| + | |||
| + | == § Voting == | ||
| + | The Number Judges receiving the highest percentage of Yes votes are elected. The Number is defined as the amount of vacent Judge positions. | ||
| − | + | == § Duty == | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | === | + | == § Powers == |
| − | |||
| − | § | + | Judges get further permissions to tear structures down in which are not for the purposes of completing a Test (ie Obelisks), and where |
| + | explained by Developers to need a veto from this law when not a test structure. | ||
| + | I don't understand this line. I also feel powers should be defined in a bit greater detail. I.e Judges may travel free of charge to the locations of disputes. etc.[[User:Ichigo|Ichigo]] | ||
| + | == § Retirement and Removal == | ||
| + | A retired Judge will gain the title "Retired Judge" and may visit Prison free of charge, a retired Judge is able to assist current Judges by assisting with the Maintnance of Prison. They have all powers that any other Judge has at Prison with the exception of sending an Exiled back to Egypt. | ||
| − | + | == § Prison == | |
| − | + | Any Judge shall be allowed to remove any prisoner from Prison. | |
| − | |||
| − | + | = New Sections = | |
| − | + | This is where new sections may be added to the petition idea. | |
| + | == Contacting a Judge == | ||
| + | <i>The law fails to establish how players may contact a judge. | ||
| + | ::More ideas welcome, while this would be nice, Demi-Pharaohs from tale 3 seemed to get a pretty big call out without having this ability. I do like this idea thou! But I think it will be vetoed. The way GMs get their calls is that all dev call go to the same board and GMs can see DEV calls, but are simply asked not to answer such calls. I doubt a new board would be allowed to be created for Judges. ~[[User:Seba|Seba]]</i> | ||
| − | + | § Contacting a Judge:<br> | |
| − | + | Players may contact a Judge through their special menu, much like contacting a GM. | |
| − | |||
| − | + | == Judge Code of Conduct == | |
| − | + | <i>I believe you mean "Code of Conduct", for this reason I have changed this expression. Further more I think players should ask what is good for a Judge to do and not do, the petition itself is just getting Judges up and running, its then up to players to say {CoC: "Judges shall not use their powers without first having a fair trail as set out below....."} ~[[User:Seba|Seba]]</i> | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | § Judge Code of Conduct:<br> | |
| + | I feel one should be made up, giving people an idea of why they should remove a Judge, even though no reason is needed. | ||
| − | ==== | + | == Judge Communications == |
| + | <i>Judges will be able to create a Guild Hall for this purpose. This doesn't need to be an added feature that the game handles. The idea is that there is two sets of Judges (two for each region - not yet stated in this petition. ~[[User:Seba|Seba]]</i> | ||
| − | + | § Judge Communications:<br> | |
| − | + | Upon election Judges will join the channel "Judge". Only Judges may join this channel. Retired Judges are permitted to join. | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | --=----=---- | |
| + | Sorry I had to go to work in the middle of typing this out, will get back to it later seba | ||
| + | --=----=---- | ||
Revision as of 02:22, 22 December 2008
Current Sections
§ Appointment
This vote is to be referred to as the initial vote. After the initial vote, whenever a vacancy arises a new vote will be called within one week. Candidates have one week to turn in their petitions, allowing a world wide vote to take place. Is this needed it seems like bloat? ~Seba
A Judge shall receive the title of "Judge". Agreed ~Seba
§ Voting
The Number Judges receiving the highest percentage of Yes votes are elected. The Number is defined as the amount of vacent Judge positions.
§ Duty
§ Powers
Judges get further permissions to tear structures down in which are not for the purposes of completing a Test (ie Obelisks), and where explained by Developers to need a veto from this law when not a test structure.
I don't understand this line. I also feel powers should be defined in a bit greater detail. I.e Judges may travel free of charge to the locations of disputes. etc.Ichigo
§ Retirement and Removal
A retired Judge will gain the title "Retired Judge" and may visit Prison free of charge, a retired Judge is able to assist current Judges by assisting with the Maintnance of Prison. They have all powers that any other Judge has at Prison with the exception of sending an Exiled back to Egypt.
§ Prison
Any Judge shall be allowed to remove any prisoner from Prison.
New Sections
This is where new sections may be added to the petition idea.
Contacting a Judge
The law fails to establish how players may contact a judge.
- More ideas welcome, while this would be nice, Demi-Pharaohs from tale 3 seemed to get a pretty big call out without having this ability. I do like this idea thou! But I think it will be vetoed. The way GMs get their calls is that all dev call go to the same board and GMs can see DEV calls, but are simply asked not to answer such calls. I doubt a new board would be allowed to be created for Judges. ~Seba
§ Contacting a Judge:
Players may contact a Judge through their special menu, much like contacting a GM.
Judge Code of Conduct
I believe you mean "Code of Conduct", for this reason I have changed this expression. Further more I think players should ask what is good for a Judge to do and not do, the petition itself is just getting Judges up and running, its then up to players to say {CoC: "Judges shall not use their powers without first having a fair trail as set out below....."} ~Seba
§ Judge Code of Conduct:
I feel one should be made up, giving people an idea of why they should remove a Judge, even though no reason is needed.
Judge Communications
Judges will be able to create a Guild Hall for this purpose. This doesn't need to be an added feature that the game handles. The idea is that there is two sets of Judges (two for each region - not yet stated in this petition. ~Seba
§ Judge Communications:
Upon election Judges will join the channel "Judge". Only Judges may join this channel. Retired Judges are permitted to join.
--=----=----
Sorry I had to go to work in the middle of typing this out, will get back to it later seba
--=----=----
